The Senate Judiciary Committee is hearing testimony from Bush's former political director
Sara M. Taylor, who has obeyed his instructions and declined to answer Congress' questions
Wednesday about her role in the firings of federal prosecutors. Nice! Thank you again Mr.
Bush for the transparency you have brought to this administration. The house is also
interested in hearing testimony from Harriet Miers, though the Bush administration has
instructed Ms. Miers to ignore the subpoena.

Email or call your reps and let them know that this is not acceptable. The administration,
just as you or I, needs to be accountable for its actions.

You can find contact info here.

Ask your reps to invoke 'Inherent Contempt' since its the only of the three
contempt proceedings that doesn't have to go through the Justice Department.

The text below is taken from the congressional oversight manual.
It's a pretty good read if you have some time to kill.

1. The Contempt of Power.

While the threat or actual issuance of a subpoena normally provides
sufficient leverage to ensure copliance, it is through the contempt of power, or
its threat, that Congress may act with ultimate force in response to actions that
obstruct the legislative process in order to punish the contemnor and/or to remove the
obstruction. The Supreme Court early recognized the power as an inherent attribute of
Congress's legislative autority, reasoning that if it did not posses this power, it
"would be exposed to every indignity and interruption that rudeness, caprice or even
conspiracy may mediate against it."

(a) Inherent Contempt